At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
And you sound like a remoaner. (See, two can play the name calling game.) We had a vote, you lost, get over it. it was EIGHT YEARS AGO, FFS.
Couple of problems with this....
So on average you've seen a cyclist run a red less than once a month? Not exactly an epidemic round your way then, is it?
Open mind 🤣
I'm gonna wait for the gravel specific ones
Ironic four foot retro reflective SLOW in the road too...
Clearly the poles should have priority in this situation so the cycle path is at fault. Although perhaps like redder lights maybe they have to be ...
Converting soonness to conspicuity is far from trivial when you are using imperial units.
He's doing such a great job
You don't?